The following is a MediaNote Classic. It was originally presented to MC101 classes in May 2019.
Is a social media platform more like a publisher (
Time Magazine, Washington Post) or is it more like the phone company? The difference is that publishers are responsible for what they put in their newspaper while the phone company is a common carrier that is not expected to listen in n phone calls. As a result, if a murder is discussed over the phone, legal scholars generally agree that the phone company is not an accessory to the crime.
Recently, Facebook removed some high-profile political extremists. What are the implications of this?
NPR reports.
Questions...
•Legally speaking, do you think Facebook is more like a publisher or more like the phone company? Why?
•Does the First Amendment right to freedom of speech give controversial figures a right to access to Facebook or any other online platform?
•Should Facebook or any other online platform be held legally responsible for violent acts that are originally discussed or planned on their platforms?
•How should Facebook and other social media platforms handle speakers and messages that are deemed dangerous in other countries?
Labels: disintermediation, ethics, firstamendment, mediaeffects, medialaw, medianoteclassic, socialnetworking