Information Superhighway
Do Americans love their cars?
Do we think iPads are cool?
Do we think we can multitask?
Well, then maybe this is the future. What do you think?
Labels: internet, mediaeffects
Do Americans love their cars?
Labels: internet, mediaeffects
Religions sometimes get involved with political or social issues. They have the right to do so. And when religious groups get involved with contentious issues, they will almost certainly be publicly criticized. The opponents have the right to do so.
Labels: ethics, firstamendment, internet, socialnetworking
This should be a wonderful time at the Aquarium of the Pacific in Long Beach. A fancy new exhibit for sea otters is opening. A celebratory press conference is scheduled for the very day that Your Humble Blogger bruises the tips of his little fingers by writing this.
Labels: advertising, publicrelations
The far reaches of free speech in American society is sometimes defined by people who we may not like: pornographers, bigots, and assorted zealots. But these people who we may find downright creepy serve a positive function. The keep the range of permissible speech broad enough to ensure free and open political and social debate, which is good for all of us.
Labels: firstamendment, medialaw
Digital 3-D movie theaters are popping up across the country. They are popular, profitable and linked to communications satellites. This means movies without film wirelessly downloaded to theaters.
California's law restricting sales of violent video games to minors is being challenged before the U.S. Supreme Court. Lawyers on both sides of the case say that academic research supports their position. Those against the law say the research does not show that children who play violent video games become more aggressive as a result. Lawyers arguing in behalf of the California law say that research does show that children who play violent video games get more aggressive as a result.
Labels: internet, mediaeffects, medialaw
Protests, pickets, sit-ins and other forms of civil disobedience are time-honored methods of expressing political dissent. Participants--sometimes brave, other times annoying--often make themselves loudly heard.
Labels: cybercrime, internet, mediaeffects